I'm embarrassed to admit have a fetish for poop from the most pristine of lady butts but not for unfrenly.
Is it possible that some of them are too cowardly to admit their unsightliness and are therefore promoting other even worse perversions to try to gain "acceptance" by proxy?
I don't get their problem. You have to be out of you're mind to think that people aren't going to find repugnant things, repugnant but it's not like it's criminalised or something and what does it matter?
I mean what does it have to do with anything outside of someone's private life? For example, how would it relate even to employment or fulfilling some other completely different functions other than self gratification?
I already made it despite being a complete screw up. Now I want to see where I can go next. I'm thinking of making a kick starter solving honkey privilege. It'll basically be a sperm bank shipping honkey sperm to the third world so that women any and every where can ensure that from the get go their children have the best opportunities in life. Lets share the honkey privilege. Are you interested? We accept USD, GBP, bitcoin, visa, mastercard and sperm.
Many people have paraphilias. I don't think it's a problem until they decide to make perversion and sexual deviancy political demanding that everyone take fart in it.
That's where you're mistaken. Paedophilia, unlike other paraphilia, by definition through the disproportionate balance of power forces other to participate, specifically children. That's extremely hard to avoid. Other paraphilias while potentially gross, unpalatable or distasteful, usual involve mutual participation between two equal parties.
You don't have to like other paraphilias, you don't have to believe they're natural and you certainly don't have to be coerced or manipulated into being involved in them when the power the be decided to support some sick and twisted bizarre movement around these things. Many people would be shocked if they understood what inclusiveness has now come to mean.
The principle behind the modern rights movement is that not only will you not allowed to be grossed out by gross things, but you will be made to eat the poopoo and you'll be made to like it. No ifs, no buts, no arguments. The only way to stop this is to destroy the existing power structure.
You'll undermine yourself with that. You're not only attacking the problem but a bunch of other things.
There are however reasonable limits to tolerance and the left is pushing way beyond that. That's a problem that should be dealt with.
I'm not sure the left has any limit to the extends they'll go whether you give them an inch, a nanometer or nothing. They're so inclusive they want to include kids in their sexual depravity. I don't think you can rationalise with that depth of madness. You can only destroy it.
Finding a bigger problem doesnt take away from the one you've presented at hand. I see from your post history that you are quite active in such engagements. If only you could realize how contradictory it is that these of your ideas are as radical and unnatural as theirs.
I don't see things such as people being into cuckoldry necessarily as a problem. I do see however people being influenced or societal conditioned into getting off from their girlfriend sleeping with a black guy out of some twisted and indoctrinated sense of racial guilt. Political or racial cuckoldry is plain stupid, especially when enforced on everyone else. One white person is raised to feel guilty about being white and then demands everyone else should feel guilty about it.
I'd find people into diapers very suspect to be honest.
I think people are misunderstanding the definition of natural. Much like homosexuality, it occurs in nature. This doesn't make it good or useful for the species, similar to albinism being harmful but still occurring. Doesnt make it right.
It might be a bit inflammatory, skating on the edge but look... I'm an intellectual and I have intellectual honesty. I'm an atheist "liberal", put in quotes because that's a synonym for authoritarian today based on the actions of those wearing the label. I'm seeing things on the TD like oh these liberal atheists are terrible and you know what? It's not entirely wrong, not by a long shot. I've had to watch Christian news to actually get some of the news of things other channels omit. It's really bad. Sure, Christian's aren't all right but they're not all wrong either. The situation is quite bizarre. When I grew up, I taught that historical examples were the worst things could get and were in decline, mostly those examples combined with the institute of the Church.
I've now realised human ineptitude is a constant. Actually Christianity I've grown a new appreciation for. In some ways the superstition can be an affliction but actually, people's own selves, have come through making the best of it, in some cases something beautiful. To me superstition, including blind obedience, is an ailment but I've underestimated the human soul. It's so strange. I thought of all the things that would be a threat it would be poor interpretations or over dependence on religious sources like the bible. I still think it's kind of BS and people are a bit vulnerable but generally, when I've studied examples of people, who grave to be good and crave what they're told to be good, even though it's neither hear nor there, do make alright from it.
I see now that human folly is a constant, it's human nature that's the problem. No cause is so noble that it's immune to people that would wield it for their own cause.
Anyway, I'm trying to impart a bit of reason and balance. I also get that people are angry, they have a right to be, but can't do anything so easily to solve the problem. If they want to down vote me so be it but I'll take one of the valuable lessons I learnt from the Christians I often headbutted with and I'll forgive them. If they need an outlet I'm happy to be that. When the powers that be put everyone in straight jacket then prance around rubbing it in our faces what they can get away with than who can blame people for cracking or having a knee jerk reaction?
No, it's a huge problem. What's in the hearts and minds of our people is important: it makes them intolerant toward normal, eusocial activities (like having kids) and tolerant toward degeneracy (like having kids).
The non-frens are always their very best to get us shut down, I bet £10 by the end of the year, we'll still be up and r/Against"""Hate""" Subs is still moaning about us
That's the whole thing though isn't it? There's no shame, no stigma for degenerates anymore. Furthermore, if you don't absolutely accept whatever abnormal shit they're into YOU are somehow the one with an issue. They don't hide it because there's no longer any fear of shame or judgement.
And ‘acceptance’ in this case isn’t just keeping your mouth shut about how abnormal their shit is, it’s demanding the open expression of your approval of their behavior. Hearing anyone talk about all these abnormal fetishes and sexualities as purely positive things sounds like they have a gun to their head—they know they’ll be tarred and feathered if they were to even suggest that something’s wrong with it. And you’re right, it all comes from the basis that there’s nothing to be ashamed of because they were “just born that way” and have no control over what they’re into sexually and therefore can’t be judged because of it
I don't think there needs to be. I have some degenerate comments and saved or upvoted posts on my account. One was especially attrocious so I deleted it, but overall I don't really care. I don't like to wallow in degeneracy, but sometimes I like to intellectually analyze it. It is entertaining and intriguing to explore certain degenerate ideas and fundamentally understand why they are wrong. And sometimes I get horny, too. But I am also not ashamed of mentioning my sexual fetishes in a political debate if it is relevant. For example, the stereotype that all right-wingers are heteronormative generic holier-than-thou Christians when it comes to sex. Absolutely not true. I wouldn't just scream it in public, because that would be inconsiderate, rude, and nobody cares, like I wouldn't want some scat fetishist screaming about their love of poop, so why would I do that myself? Golden rule. But society, I think, is still way too judgemental of certain fetishes and doesn't really understand them well. And I honestly can't be bothered to make an Alt-account. I have alt-accounts, of course, but those are mostly for expressing different types of political views.
But society, I think, is still way too judgemental of certain fetishes and doesn't really understand them well.
Holy shit which fetishes would that be? The more perverse the more it's celebrated. Society is entirely too tolerant of every anti-social behavior that pops up, especially when you consider that many sexual proclivities are actually treated like valid identities.
Only among far-leftists and in all of the Media, television, internet, academia, and cultural periodicals. When you actually go to a blue-collar workplace or construction site or farm/ranch in the heartland, the "salt-of-the-earth" type Americans are still very disgusted by fetish shit in general. Twitter/Tumblr isn't the real world, you know. In fact, your average normie apolitical/moderate middle class American would STILL be somewhat disgusted if some transgender nude homosexuals came strolling through their neighborhood in a gigantic poop-truck that read "scat-pride worldwide!" Most neocons and Bible belt Christians, even if they aren't "awake" on the JQ necessarily, are still universally averse to ultra-degeneracy and things like drag-queen story hour. In addition, Catholics and Hispanics/Latinos also look down on that kind of stuff, as often do religious protestant blacks, and Asian immigrants. I would say that EASILY a majority of normal Americans are disgusted by and BARELY tolerant of (some may feign tolerance because they don't want to be judged for being bigots but secretly despise it) fetish, perverse, and degenerate shit.
​
By saying "society is tolerant of degeneracy", you are giving in to the myth that ultra-leftists form the majority in America, which is exactly what keeps the neoliberal masses from speaking up, is the idea that everyone else is actually totally tolerant of all sexual degeneracy and they just need to man the hell up and join their peers. The truth is that very few of them are, but those that do love those things create the ILLUSION that they have the majority of America on their side, when the reality is that they don't.
They have one guy skynetjusticewarrior who is actually obsessed with frenworld in a very unhealthy way. Writing essays with hundreds of links about frenworld almost daily..
Nobody with an actual job or school has the time for that shit right?
You can't make this shit up, I was arguing with some retard on political humor because I was bored and checked their profile. This motherfucker was posting pictures of himself in diapers and with pacifiers in his mouth. I said he was disgusting because he fetishizing babies and he called me "ignorant"....
It might be a bit inflammatory, skating on the edge but look... I'm an intellectual and I have intellectual honesty. I'm an atheist "liberal", put in quotes because that's a synonym for authoritarian today based on the actions of those wearing the label. I'm seeing things on the TD like oh these liberal atheists are terrible and you know what? It's not entirely wrong, not by a long shot. I've had to watch Christian news to actually get some of the news of things other channels omit. It's really bad. Sure, Christian's aren't all right but they're not all wrong either. The situation is quite bizarre. When I grew up, I taught that historical examples were the worst things could get and were in decline, mostly those examples combined with the institute of the Church.
I've now realised human ineptitude is a constant. Actually Christianity I've grown a new appreciation for. In some ways the superstition can be an affliction but actually, people's own selves, have come through making the best of it, in some cases something beautiful. To me superstition, including blind obedience, is an ailment but I've underestimated the human soul. It's so strange. I thought of all the things that would be a threat it would be poor interpretations or over dependence on religious sources like the bible. I still think it's kind of BS and people are a bit vulnerable but generally, when I've studied examples of people, who grave to be good and crave what they're told to be good, even though it's neither hear nor there, do make alright from it.
I see now that human folly is a constant, it's human nature that's the problem. No cause is so noble that it's immune to people that would wield it for their own cause.
Anyway, I'm trying to impart a bit of reason and balance. I also get that people are angry, they have a right to be, but can't do anything so easily to solve the problem. If they want to down vote me so be it but I'll take one of the valuable lessons I learnt from the Christians I often headbutted with and I'll forgive them. If they need an outlet I'm happy to be that. When the powers that be put everyone in straight jacket then prance around rubbing it in our faces what they can get away with than who can blame people for cracking or having a knee jerk reaction?
88 comments
8 armaliteisforlovers 2019-06-12
Ayyyyy, that's nasty, and it so many of them! It's almost like they have a fetish for being unfrenly.
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
I'm embarrassed to admit have a fetish for poop from the most pristine of lady butts but not for unfrenly.
Is it possible that some of them are too cowardly to admit their unsightliness and are therefore promoting other even worse perversions to try to gain "acceptance" by proxy?
I don't get their problem. You have to be out of you're mind to think that people aren't going to find repugnant things, repugnant but it's not like it's criminalised or something and what does it matter?
I mean what does it have to do with anything outside of someone's private life? For example, how would it relate even to employment or fulfilling some other completely different functions other than self gratification?
Makes no sense.
1 CouthyJeziies 2019-06-12
damn fren, i hope you will make it in life.
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
I already made it despite being a complete screw up. Now I want to see where I can go next. I'm thinking of making a kick starter solving honkey privilege. It'll basically be a sperm bank shipping honkey sperm to the third world so that women any and every where can ensure that from the get go their children have the best opportunities in life. Lets share the honkey privilege. Are you interested? We accept USD, GBP, bitcoin, visa, mastercard and sperm.
Always remember, sharing is caring, never forget.
5 FoxDieEeE 2019-06-12
The nonfrens arent sending their best!
1 DeceptiveFallacy 2019-06-12
But they are...
1 thatwentwel1 2019-06-12
That is sad fren!
1 Chainsawninja 2019-06-12
I'd hate to see their worst....
1 Ivanvackinof 2019-06-12
Their best are the diaperfurs. Their worst are the pedos(they call them MAPs).
1 Steampunkfox999 2019-06-12
Nonfrens are the bad kind of furry all the yiff going to waste on thier disgusting fetishes damn shame
5 ser-of-cannabis 2019-06-12
Nonfrens eat poopoo!
7 theyreallinonit2 2019-06-12
nonfrens are gross
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
Many people have paraphilias. I don't think it's a problem until they decide to make perversion and sexual deviancy political demanding that everyone take fart in it.
1 FattestPupper 2019-06-12
This is the same logic that enables pedophilia to become increasingly accepted. When will people learn that some shit just isnt natural
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
That's where you're mistaken. Paedophilia, unlike other paraphilia, by definition through the disproportionate balance of power forces other to participate, specifically children. That's extremely hard to avoid. Other paraphilias while potentially gross, unpalatable or distasteful, usual involve mutual participation between two equal parties.
You don't have to like other paraphilias, you don't have to believe they're natural and you certainly don't have to be coerced or manipulated into being involved in them when the power the be decided to support some sick and twisted bizarre movement around these things. Many people would be shocked if they understood what inclusiveness has now come to mean.
The principle behind the modern rights movement is that not only will you not allowed to be grossed out by gross things, but you will be made to eat the poopoo and you'll be made to like it. No ifs, no buts, no arguments. The only way to stop this is to destroy the existing power structure.
1 FattestPupper 2019-06-12
I dont have to use fancy talk at 1am to explain that if you give people an inch, they'll take a mile.
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
You'll undermine yourself with that. You're not only attacking the problem but a bunch of other things.
There are however reasonable limits to tolerance and the left is pushing way beyond that. That's a problem that should be dealt with.
I'm not sure the left has any limit to the extends they'll go whether you give them an inch, a nanometer or nothing. They're so inclusive they want to include kids in their sexual depravity. I don't think you can rationalise with that depth of madness. You can only destroy it.
1 FattestPupper 2019-06-12
Finding a bigger problem doesnt take away from the one you've presented at hand. I see from your post history that you are quite active in such engagements. If only you could realize how contradictory it is that these of your ideas are as radical and unnatural as theirs.
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
I don't see things such as people being into cuckoldry necessarily as a problem. I do see however people being influenced or societal conditioned into getting off from their girlfriend sleeping with a black guy out of some twisted and indoctrinated sense of racial guilt. Political or racial cuckoldry is plain stupid, especially when enforced on everyone else. One white person is raised to feel guilty about being white and then demands everyone else should feel guilty about it.
I'd find people into diapers very suspect to be honest.
1 PM-Me-Ur-Plants 2019-06-12
Of course, the reasonable person is being massively downvoted.
1 [deleted] 2019-06-12
[removed]
1 [deleted] 2019-06-12
[removed]
1 I_TRY_TO_BE_POSITIVE 2019-06-12
It is natural, to some degree. The point is that we're not monkeys and we are better than that.
1 Memcallen 2019-06-12
No, it's literally not. We have an imprinted biological aversion to it, along with spoiled food and other things that can make us sick.
1 I_TRY_TO_BE_POSITIVE 2019-06-12
I think people are misunderstanding the definition of natural. Much like homosexuality, it occurs in nature. This doesn't make it good or useful for the species, similar to albinism being harmful but still occurring. Doesnt make it right.
1 DancingIsraeli 2019-06-12
fuck off pedo
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
Although part of the word is the same, not all paraphilias are pedophilia, in fact pedophilia is one of many hundreds.
1 DILAPIDAT3 2019-06-12
This is b8
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
It might be a bit inflammatory, skating on the edge but look... I'm an intellectual and I have intellectual honesty. I'm an atheist "liberal", put in quotes because that's a synonym for authoritarian today based on the actions of those wearing the label. I'm seeing things on the TD like oh these liberal atheists are terrible and you know what? It's not entirely wrong, not by a long shot. I've had to watch Christian news to actually get some of the news of things other channels omit. It's really bad. Sure, Christian's aren't all right but they're not all wrong either. The situation is quite bizarre. When I grew up, I taught that historical examples were the worst things could get and were in decline, mostly those examples combined with the institute of the Church.
I've now realised human ineptitude is a constant. Actually Christianity I've grown a new appreciation for. In some ways the superstition can be an affliction but actually, people's own selves, have come through making the best of it, in some cases something beautiful. To me superstition, including blind obedience, is an ailment but I've underestimated the human soul. It's so strange. I thought of all the things that would be a threat it would be poor interpretations or over dependence on religious sources like the bible. I still think it's kind of BS and people are a bit vulnerable but generally, when I've studied examples of people, who grave to be good and crave what they're told to be good, even though it's neither hear nor there, do make alright from it.
I see now that human folly is a constant, it's human nature that's the problem. No cause is so noble that it's immune to people that would wield it for their own cause.
Anyway, I'm trying to impart a bit of reason and balance. I also get that people are angry, they have a right to be, but can't do anything so easily to solve the problem. If they want to down vote me so be it but I'll take one of the valuable lessons I learnt from the Christians I often headbutted with and I'll forgive them. If they need an outlet I'm happy to be that. When the powers that be put everyone in straight jacket then prance around rubbing it in our faces what they can get away with than who can blame people for cracking or having a knee jerk reaction?
It's really beyond the pale.
1 Phaninator 2019-06-12
xd
-1 nobodysbusiness77897 2019-06-12
Why did people downvote this, this is true
1 TheCultureOfCritique 2019-06-12
He said:
​
You said:
​
It's downvoted because it was always a problem.
-2 nobodysbusiness77897 2019-06-12
Having a fetish isn’t a problem until you act on it in such away that’s dangerous to yourself or others
1 FrenlyHuman 2019-06-12
You like eating doodoo don't you fren? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
1 nobodysbusiness77897 2019-06-12
No I like hot slender feet on dudes 😏
1 HKoftheForrest 2019-06-12
no wonder you are trying to defend the other weirdos
1 nobodysbusiness77897 2019-06-12
It’s called sarcasm
1 MemoryLapse 2019-06-12
No, it's a huge problem. What's in the hearts and minds of our people is important: it makes them intolerant toward normal, eusocial activities (like having kids) and tolerant toward degeneracy (like having kids).
1 despitebeing13pc 2019-06-12
look bishap he got his fist in da mans anoos
2 SONNEN_RADICAL 2019-06-12
I would actually be more surprised if they didn't
1 madviIIian 2019-06-12
show lol
1 fx_feels 2019-06-12
The non-frens are always their very best to get us shut down, I bet £10 by the end of the year, we'll still be up and r/Against"""Hate""" Subs is still moaning about us
1 Furscist 2019-06-12
You'd think they'd be smart enough to just make an alt for weird fetish shit.
1 armaliteisforlovers 2019-06-12
That's the whole thing though isn't it? There's no shame, no stigma for degenerates anymore. Furthermore, if you don't absolutely accept whatever abnormal shit they're into YOU are somehow the one with an issue. They don't hide it because there's no longer any fear of shame or judgement.
1 redwoods-memer 2019-06-12
I’m into chubby furries, and even I have a little shame in saying that.
1 Ch3fB0yardee 2019-06-12
Just fucking kill yourself
1 redwoods-memer 2019-06-12
You have a point
1 redwoods-memer 2019-06-12
Well that backfired
1 retrovim 2019-06-12
Its anonymous though. I think its entirely different for people to be "shameless" about stuff they would never share IRL on the internet.
1 booradland 2019-06-12
And ‘acceptance’ in this case isn’t just keeping your mouth shut about how abnormal their shit is, it’s demanding the open expression of your approval of their behavior. Hearing anyone talk about all these abnormal fetishes and sexualities as purely positive things sounds like they have a gun to their head—they know they’ll be tarred and feathered if they were to even suggest that something’s wrong with it. And you’re right, it all comes from the basis that there’s nothing to be ashamed of because they were “just born that way” and have no control over what they’re into sexually and therefore can’t be judged because of it
1 Dialgatime321X 2019-06-12
I don't think there needs to be. I have some degenerate comments and saved or upvoted posts on my account. One was especially attrocious so I deleted it, but overall I don't really care. I don't like to wallow in degeneracy, but sometimes I like to intellectually analyze it. It is entertaining and intriguing to explore certain degenerate ideas and fundamentally understand why they are wrong. And sometimes I get horny, too. But I am also not ashamed of mentioning my sexual fetishes in a political debate if it is relevant. For example, the stereotype that all right-wingers are heteronormative generic holier-than-thou Christians when it comes to sex. Absolutely not true. I wouldn't just scream it in public, because that would be inconsiderate, rude, and nobody cares, like I wouldn't want some scat fetishist screaming about their love of poop, so why would I do that myself? Golden rule. But society, I think, is still way too judgemental of certain fetishes and doesn't really understand them well. And I honestly can't be bothered to make an Alt-account. I have alt-accounts, of course, but those are mostly for expressing different types of political views.
1 Kim_Honk_Il 2019-06-12
Holy shit which fetishes would that be? The more perverse the more it's celebrated. Society is entirely too tolerant of every anti-social behavior that pops up, especially when you consider that many sexual proclivities are actually treated like valid identities.
1 Dialgatime321X 2019-06-12
"The more perverse the more it's celebrated."
Only among far-leftists and in all of the Media, television, internet, academia, and cultural periodicals. When you actually go to a blue-collar workplace or construction site or farm/ranch in the heartland, the "salt-of-the-earth" type Americans are still very disgusted by fetish shit in general. Twitter/Tumblr isn't the real world, you know. In fact, your average normie apolitical/moderate middle class American would STILL be somewhat disgusted if some transgender nude homosexuals came strolling through their neighborhood in a gigantic poop-truck that read "scat-pride worldwide!" Most neocons and Bible belt Christians, even if they aren't "awake" on the JQ necessarily, are still universally averse to ultra-degeneracy and things like drag-queen story hour. In addition, Catholics and Hispanics/Latinos also look down on that kind of stuff, as often do religious protestant blacks, and Asian immigrants. I would say that EASILY a majority of normal Americans are disgusted by and BARELY tolerant of (some may feign tolerance because they don't want to be judged for being bigots but secretly despise it) fetish, perverse, and degenerate shit.
​
By saying "society is tolerant of degeneracy", you are giving in to the myth that ultra-leftists form the majority in America, which is exactly what keeps the neoliberal masses from speaking up, is the idea that everyone else is actually totally tolerant of all sexual degeneracy and they just need to man the hell up and join their peers. The truth is that very few of them are, but those that do love those things create the ILLUSION that they have the majority of America on their side, when the reality is that they don't.
1 adamscus 2019-06-12
Who would have imagined!!?!
1 Kim_Honk_Il 2019-06-12
With nonfrens like that, who needs frens?
All of us do, that's who.
1 [deleted] 2019-06-12
[removed]
1 Clutchmaster38 2019-06-12
Can u link one, fren? I need to see for myself the funny.
1 Kim_Honk_Il 2019-06-12
No fren. That could lead to brigading and that's not what frens do.
1 ImMadYouSaidThis 2019-06-12
Nice detective work fren!
1 Dogy_Cyka 2019-06-12
Non frens use the same pattern
1 GODHATHNOOPINION 2019-06-12
It is quite funny, but we shouldn't kink shame fren.
1 ShadowMoon172 2019-06-12
Why not? If nonfrens are being bad we should point it out, fren.
1 Kim_Honk_Il 2019-06-12
They obviously don't receive enough shaming.
1 Supreme_Kommandant 2019-06-12
Kink shaming is my kink
1 TristanIsSpiffy 2019-06-12
screams
1 Dreamcast3 2019-06-12
Kinks have a place, but that place is not frenworld.
Also cuck isn't a kink, it's literally just getting off to being a beta male.
1 GODHATHNOOPINION 2019-06-12
completely agree fren. As i am not doing things to your genitals what you like doesnt matter but just having a kink is okay.
1 Giulio-Cesare 2019-06-12
Shaming people is good.
1 13_52 2019-06-12
They have one guy skynetjusticewarrior who is actually obsessed with frenworld in a very unhealthy way. Writing essays with hundreds of links about frenworld almost daily..
Nobody with an actual job or school has the time for that shit right?
1 armaliteisforlovers 2019-06-12
Is that really a guy? We've had a couple of conversations, a very unstable person. Manic even. I just always assumed it was a woman.
1 13_52 2019-06-12
Oh I wouldn't know I assume everyone one the internet is a dude
1 IshyOQGX 2019-06-12
How goes the ancient saying?
"There are no girls on the internet"
Still holds true.
1 Cajoal 2019-06-12
The internet, where men are boys, women are men, and boys are FBI agents.
1 [deleted] 2019-06-12
[removed]
1 VonRemer 2019-06-12
Wat
1 Brawl501 2019-06-12
Oh? On God?
1 [deleted] 2019-06-12
[removed]
1 Lets_Skedadle 2019-06-12
You can't make this shit up, I was arguing with some retard on political humor because I was bored and checked their profile. This motherfucker was posting pictures of himself in diapers and with pacifiers in his mouth. I said he was disgusting because he fetishizing babies and he called me "ignorant"....
What is wrong with these people?
1 MillionDollarBonus-- 2019-06-12
Peeeeeee Yewwwww! Those nonfrens sure are stinky!
1 cosle 2019-06-12
I turned off NSFW posts frens so I can’t see.
A lot of the people being downvoted when I click on their profiles it says I can’t access it because it’s NSFW
1 RadiantUpstairs 2019-06-12
"Upside out
Inside down
False alarm the only game in town
No man's land the only game in town
Parable the only game in town"
(Grateful Dead, Passenger)
0 FearHisBeard29 2019-06-12
I wouldn’t be surprised if antifrens are also into DDLG and CBT, unironically.
2 armaliteisforlovers 2019-06-12
I had to look that up. That first one......this is why God is going to burn the earth.
1 Kim_Honk_Il 2019-06-12
I'm already gripping the chainlink fence.
2 TheyShootBeesAtYou 2019-06-12
Don't forget your 2 million SPF sunblock, fren.
1 armaliteisforlovers 2019-06-12
I mean, seriously. That daddy little shit is just another level of fucked.
1 Memcallen 2019-06-12
"What do you mean I have issues with my dad"
1 armaliteisforlovers 2019-06-12
☑️Acts like a brat
☑️Calls all men daddy during sex
☑️Can't get off without being choked
"Yeah, my dad and don't really get along"
1 Supreme_Kommandant 2019-06-12
Kink shaming is my kink
1 dogkindrepresent 2019-06-12
It might be a bit inflammatory, skating on the edge but look... I'm an intellectual and I have intellectual honesty. I'm an atheist "liberal", put in quotes because that's a synonym for authoritarian today based on the actions of those wearing the label. I'm seeing things on the TD like oh these liberal atheists are terrible and you know what? It's not entirely wrong, not by a long shot. I've had to watch Christian news to actually get some of the news of things other channels omit. It's really bad. Sure, Christian's aren't all right but they're not all wrong either. The situation is quite bizarre. When I grew up, I taught that historical examples were the worst things could get and were in decline, mostly those examples combined with the institute of the Church.
I've now realised human ineptitude is a constant. Actually Christianity I've grown a new appreciation for. In some ways the superstition can be an affliction but actually, people's own selves, have come through making the best of it, in some cases something beautiful. To me superstition, including blind obedience, is an ailment but I've underestimated the human soul. It's so strange. I thought of all the things that would be a threat it would be poor interpretations or over dependence on religious sources like the bible. I still think it's kind of BS and people are a bit vulnerable but generally, when I've studied examples of people, who grave to be good and crave what they're told to be good, even though it's neither hear nor there, do make alright from it.
I see now that human folly is a constant, it's human nature that's the problem. No cause is so noble that it's immune to people that would wield it for their own cause.
Anyway, I'm trying to impart a bit of reason and balance. I also get that people are angry, they have a right to be, but can't do anything so easily to solve the problem. If they want to down vote me so be it but I'll take one of the valuable lessons I learnt from the Christians I often headbutted with and I'll forgive them. If they need an outlet I'm happy to be that. When the powers that be put everyone in straight jacket then prance around rubbing it in our faces what they can get away with than who can blame people for cracking or having a knee jerk reaction?
It's really beyond the pale.